Why Don’t Firms Claim their Tax Refunds? Evidence from Private Debt Contracts
نویسنده
چکیده
A puzzle is why a large proportion of firms eligible for income tax refunds do not file claims for such refunds on a timely basis. I hypothesize that firms with private information about higher future profitability and seeking debt financing forgo immediate use of provisions that allow the carryback of net operating losses as a signaling device to separate from firms with lower future profitability in order to obtain more favorable borrowing terms. Firms expecting lower profitability are deterred from mimicking because carrying net operating losses forward is less valuable to them. Consistent with this hypothesis, firms that do not file claims for refunds on a timely basis display higher future profitability and receive lower debt financing costs than firms that file when they first become eligible. These results are stronger when the level of information asymmetry about the borrower’s type is greater. This study is the first to offer a rational explanation for the low take-up rate of tax refunds. As a result, the evidence presented in this study could be relevant to academics and fiscal policy makers that seek to better understand how tax policies affect real decisions. This Draft: February 2016
منابع مشابه
The Optimal Mix of Bank and Market Debt: An Asset Pricing Approach∗
This paper examines the optimal mix and priority structure of bank and market debt using a tax shield-bankruptcy cost tradeoff model where the only unique feature of banks is their ability to renegotiate. Closed-form expressions are derived for the values of renegotiable bank debt, non-renegotiable market debt, equity, and levered firm values. Optimal debt structure hinges upon ex post bargaini...
متن کاملCan the Trade-off Theory Explain Debt Structure?
We examine the optimal mixture and priority structure of bank and market debt using a trade-off model in which banks have the unique ability to renegotiate outside formal bankruptcy. Flexible bank debt offers a superior trade-off between tax shields and bankruptcy costs. Ease of renegotiation limits bank debt capacity, however. Optimal debt structure hinges upon which party has bargaining power...
متن کاملEvidence on Asset Sales and Income Management: Case of Iran
This study empirically examines whether managers manipulate reported income through the timing of sales of long-lived assets and investments. Several empirical implications of the income-smoothing and debt-equity hypothesis in the context of asset sales were tested. The findings are consistent with the timing of asset sales by managers so that the recognized accounting income from these sales s...
متن کاملThe General Rules of Contracts and the Rules of Anti-avoidance and Anti-evasion Paying Taxes (Tax Fraud)
Taxation issues are among the factors which balance between private rights and public interests. But the legal system of contracts also works for the welfare of the people and society. The general rules of contracts and the principles of private law have found their essential functions during the years. Applying the above rules aimed at preserving public order along with the private rights of ...
متن کاملDO TAXES AFFECT CORPORATE DEBT POLICY? Evidence from U.S. Corporate Tax Return Data
This paper uses U.S. Statistics of Income (SOI) Corporate Income Tax Returns balance sheet data on all corporations, to estimate the effects of changes in corporate tax rates on the debt policies of firms of different sizes. Small firms face very different tax rates than larger firms, and relative tax rates have also changed frequently over time, providing substantial information to identify ta...
متن کامل